How a Monitored Security System Affects Crime Statistics

Burglary Crime Statistics

This post is originally authored at the home security blog at FamilyHomeSecurity.com.

It’s estimated that around 14% of homeowners own some type of burglar prevention system for their home. This may include monitored security systems, simple motion detection alarms, security lights and video surveillance. However, many people don’t fully understand how having a monitored security system directly affects the chance that their home will be successfully burglarized. Though some of these statistics are circumstantial (relating to the crime rate in an area, the type of home, neighbors, etc), they can still provide a window of insight on the effectiveness of monitored security systems.

In a quick “unofficial” poll conducted of 30 unrelated individuals (via Twitter), only four users stated that they believed that a monitored security system would actually reduce their chance of being burglarized. Six out of these 30 users said that they believed that a monitored home security system is worth the cost. In reality, the statistics tell a different story.

Chance of Being Burglarized

In a year-long period of time, some statistics state that a home has a one-in-four chance of being burglarized (Note: This is without paying attention to circumstantial situations). The Greenwich Study of Residential Security provided some interesting statistics about the different percentage of homes that were burglarized with and without alarm systems. According to this particular study, a home without an alarm system is from 2.7 to 3.5 times more likely to be burglarized than a home that has a burglar alarm. In this study, the importance of displaying a security “Alarm Sign” (which is included with most all monitored security systems) was also highlighted. Since the Canadian homeowners in the study often failed to display their signs due to heavy snow, the benefit of having an alarm system was slightly lower for residents in that category.

Another interesting statistic (from a study by the National Burglar and Fire Association) was that 9 out of 10 convicted burglars admitted that they would avoid stealing from a house that had a monitored security system.

When a monitored security system is combined with other security features (such as deadbolt locks, security lights and video surveillance), the chance of being burglarized drops even further. One statistic even stated that homes that use combined security measures have less than a 1% chance of being successfully burglarized.

Cost of Monitored Security

The actual cost of having a monitored home security system is subject to a lot of misunderstanding. Due to the fact that most monitored security systems include a monthly fee (and a contract), many people often see them as an unnecessary expense. However, the average burglary (according to a 2005 FBI study) will result in $1,725 in losses. Depending on the crime statistics in a specific area, a home could have a 25% chance of being burglarized each year. This could be interpreted as a homeowner having a one-in-four chance of losing around $1,725 each year from a burglary.

A basic security system package will cost around $40 per month, resulting in $480 spent per year on monitored security. However, having monitored security often results in a reduction in homeowner’s insurance of up to 20%. If your home insurance costs you $100 per month (or $1200 per year), you would save $20 per month (or $240 per year). This means that you could interpret the average cost of a security system to $20 per month, or $240 per year. However, every homeowner’s situation is different, and you must evaluate if having a monitored security system is within your budget.

Related posts:

  1. Monitored Home Security System – Is it Worth the Cost? This post is originally authored at the home security blog…
  2. What is Monitored Security? This post is originally authored at the home security blog…

Read the original here:
How a Monitored Security System Affects Crime Statistics

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in Home Security Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Smart Guard System Launches “Smart Surveillance Solution”

Smart Guard Systems Launches ‘’Smart Surveillance Solutions’’ – Lightweight and portable with high processing power. Smart Surveillance Solutions – Ultra-compact Mega performance, Smart Combination Redefined. (I-Newswire) July 29, 2010 – Smart Guard Systems has launched an innovative and smart surveillance solution especially designed for IP surveillance market. The Smart Micro NVR has designed and developed [...]

Read the original here:
Smart Guard System Launches “Smart Surveillance Solution”

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in CCTV Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawsuit Update

First things first. Lots of people want to know what’s going to happen, whether we will settle or fight.

We don’t know.

To be honest, neither of us have firmly decided one way or the other. When people start using the law in unorthodox ways to bully or extort from small nonprofit blogs, you don’t want to cave to them. Then you find out just how much it costs to stand on principle. Righthaven knows the breaking point for most people, hence the multiple low-key settlements.

Rest assured, Clayton, David and TheArmedCitizen will cooperate with the law to the fullest extent required. It was never our intent to infringe, and if such an infringement occurred, we will do our best to correct the error.

To clarify from the earlier post, Righthaven’s claim is based on just one article from May 2010. (The filing lists previous articles copied or excerpted from the Review-Journal in the past 7 years of website archives.)

In Our Favor…
For a company that goes around slapping bloggers with lawsuits, Righthaven’s decision to put The Armed Citizen in its sights may be imprudent. The owners hardly get rich off this site, and when the main contributor is a young kid fresh out of college, the financial returns aren’t going to be very handsome.

In short, these are the wrong pockets to pick.

That being said, while The Armed Citizen doesn’t have money, we do have friends. Lots of them. We’ve already received multiple encouraging e-mails and support from loyal readers. We hear you’ve been contacting the Journal-Review, and other allies like the NRA, for which we are extremely grateful. Please, don’t stop.

The publicity of this may be another factor Righthaven neglected. Already, the Review-Journal’s rival paper, the Las Vegas Sun, is running stories on these lawsuits. Wired.com ran a story which was then linked to on the Drudge Report. Reason magazine and World Net Daily are among other popular sources that have run with this story, along with countless bloggers.

More About Righthaven
Righthaven actually secured the copyright in July…or, nearly two months after the article appeared on the website. In other words, Righthaven attorneys preparing their litigious blitzkrieg found the article (likely because we linked back to their website), and in order to pursue statutory damages (as opposed to actual damages, which would be little to none), secured a copyright to the article after the fact.

Wired.com described the dozens of lawsuits as a business plan for gleaning copyright profits. This is hardly unfair, given the number of lawsuits filed.

Click here to read a list of the lawsuits filed by Righthaven since March 2010 (PDF)

This list itself is incomplete because Righthaven files new lawsuits constantly. On July 21, suits were filed against Free Speech Systems LLC and Americans for Democratic Action, Inc. More recently (July 26) suits were filed against Paula Bliss and former mob enforcer Anthony Fiato, both private bloggers. This brings the number of lawsuits from Righthaven to 81.

Click here to track ongoing lawsuits from Righthaven.

In Our Defense
There are several dubious claims made in the lawsuit, among which that we targeted advertising to the residents of Nevada, which is wholly false.

There is also a powerful argument in favor of fair use. According to copyright.gov, “The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission.”

Given the noncommercial and scholarly nature of the website, and the fact that we were collecting thousands of stories for the purposes of a silent-but-deafening commentary on armed self-defense – which recent events prove to be a pivotal issue of debate from both a Constitutional and a societal point of view – may contribute to a strong case for fair use.

Neither Clayton nor David have been served yet, and the case can’t proceed until we have received formal notice.

What Can You Do?

Pay – Every little bit helps. If we wind up having to settle, it will help offset those expenses. If not, then we promise we’ll use it to make the blog bigger and better than ever.

Pray – Most armed citizens know that life is governed by a higher power. We could certainly use your prayers for wisdom, and against the adversaries that have arisen.

Talk – Keep spreading the word about this lawsuit. Blog about it. (Yes, you can reproduce material here, including the image!) Tell your friends. Post it on Facebook. Help guarantee the full story about Righthaven is told on Wikipedia. Tip the news services about it, even the big ones. If you know copyright attorneys (especially in Nevada), send them our way.

Many of you have contacted the Review-Journal and reported back to us. The paper has asked you to direct your inquiries to two people, the managing editor and the chief counsel. Here is their information:

Managing Editor:
Charlie Zobell
czobell@reviewjournal.com.

Corporate Counsel:
Mark Hieneber
702-477-3830

We ask that you be polite, but we do ask you to contact them.

We thank you for your support and assistance. We trust that this matter will be resolved, and The Armed Citizen can return to providing you the content you’ve come to expect.

Sincerely,
David and Clayton

Further links
List of Righthaven-owned or affiliated newspapers to avoid
Does Righthaven’s Founder Have Ties to Obama?

Read more here:
Lawsuit Update

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in Self Defense | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Merlin 3 software integrates intruder, fire and CCTV systems

Initsys announces the immediate availability of Merlin 3, the latest generation of advanced control room software. Merlin 3 provides a cost effective solution to integrate new and existing intruder and fire alarms with CCTV systems and enable control room operators to deliver a faster, more efficient response to all alarm activations at a fraction of the cost of deploying a completely new system.

Read more from the original source:
Merlin 3 software integrates intruder, fire and CCTV systems

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in CCTV Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Theia lens plays key role with netcam at South Africa World Cup

Camera Corps selected Theia Technologies’ ultra wide angle, undistorted megapixel lens in their Net-Cam system to cover World Cup soccer play. The Net-Cam uses Theia’s MY125M lens on Toshiba’s IK-HR1S 2.1 megapixel camera. The lens provides up to 125 degrees horizontal field of view and dramatically reduces the fisheye distortion of typical wide angle lenses.

Read more from the original source:
Theia lens plays key role with netcam at South Africa World Cup

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in CCTV Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

China to see boom in demand for surveillance products, where do we stand?

Securityinfowatch.com has posted a nice little article on the growth of China‘s security market. I for one agree. China has been making a huge push into the world market place and I see little reason to believe that they will not continue to grow. One aspect to China’s growth is the low or no import [...]

Read more here:
China to see boom in demand for surveillance products, where do we stand?

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in CCTV Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Home Security Systems from Door-to-Door Salesmen

burglar alarm

This post is originally authored at the home security blog at FamilyHomeSecurity.com.

During the summer, the seasonal selling of security systems reaches its peak. Companies hire students on summer break to go out door-to-door to sale alarms, and the companies’ growth has exploded because of it. Last summer, the largest door-to-door company sold near 200,000 security systems in 100 markets around the United States. Although some of the home security systems are a good buy, the vast majority are not.

One of the downfalls to purchasing security systems from door-to-door salesmen is it actually makes your home vulnerable. These types of alarm systems use a home phone line which can easily be cut by a burglar. A cellular alarm system is a better and safer system to use. The salesman may claim that it is a free or discounted service, but the monthly fees are actually quite high. The home security system that is installed tends to be extremely basic and is simply a kit. The basic kit may not meet your needs or fully protect your house and family. If you decide to update or increase your security, it is usually very expensive.

Those who sale the home security systems are also compensated so they can be aggressive and use pressure to get you to buy something you do not want or need. The managers are also paid from sales; as a result they may ignore questionable sales practices. Some companies have gone so far as to impersonate a home’s existing security system provider or to claim a home’s existing security company is no longer in business. One tactic that has been used is offering a free alarm system if companies can display their logo/sign in your yard. The system does not stay free for long and can cost a lot because of long time contracts or monthly fees.

To protect yourself when a salesman comes to your door offering home security, ask for a company ID and the company’s license. A license will hopefully guarantee that the sales representative had a background check to ensure he has never been convicted of burglary. Always get a full explanation of the security system and how it works. Be sure you fully understand the costs. How much does it cost to upgrade or discontinue service? Is there an installation fee? Take time to think about it before you sign the contract. You need time to fully read the contract and research online for reviews. If the salesperson is pushy, the company is probably not trustworthy.

Always play it smart when it comes to your home and family’s protection. Do not give out important information like your credit card or social security number. Remember that what is offered as free can end up costing you.

Sources:

http://www.alarmsales.org/

http://www.prweb.com/releases/home_security/door_to_door_sales/prweb4268684.htm

Read more here:
Home Security Systems from Door-to-Door Salesmen

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in Home Security Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jack Hanna Uses Pepper Spray Against Grizzly

Everyone knows famous zookeeper and television personality Jack Hanna. What you probablly didn’t know is that he carries pepper spray religiously for self defense against both humans and animals. While hiking Saturday in Glacier National Park a small bear weighing about 125 pounds came charging toward the famous zookeeper. TV host and zookeeper Jack Hanna says he took his own advice and used pepper spray on a grizzly bear headed toward him.

Hanna reports discharging his pepper spray canister first, at about 30 feet. The hope was that the wind would help carry it and deter the bear. Well that didn’t happen and the bear kept coming forward. At about 20 feet he sprayed again but the bear continued to move toward him. Finally, as the bear got within 10 feet Hanna was able to spray and hit him right in the face. The bear turned and fled in the opposite direction!

Most pepper spray products are not made to be effective at 30 feet. Most two or four ounce cannisters have a range of up to 18 feet. Bear spray, however is made to be effective at upwards of 30 feet. Hanna has been carrying pepper spray for over 15 years and this was the first time he’d ever had to use it.

Imagine what would could have happened had he not had the pepper spray? It appears they surprised a mother bear and her cubs. “We thought of letting them go by, but the trail was cut into the rock and was too narrow,” Hanna said. “So I said, ‘Everybody talk loud and we’ll back up until we can get off the trail.’” Hanna told everyone to crawl up the hill and put their backs against the wall. They all stood quietly and still while the mother and one cub passed them. The second cub decided to charge them.

Whether hiking, biking, running, or walking you just never know when a dangerous situation will present itself. Preparation today could indeed save your life tomorrow.

Share/Bookmark

Read more here:
Jack Hanna Uses Pepper Spray Against Grizzly

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in Personal Security | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Unemployment on the Horizon for Car Thieves

car theft

This post is originally authored at the home security blog at FamilyHomeSecurity.com.

Over the past two years, auto thefts have fallen 20%. Most of the urban areas in the United States reported fewer burglaries. This did not just occur overnight, however. Since 1991, vehicle burglaries have been dropping steadily. There are a few reasons, though, for the sharp and significant decrease in the past year.

One reason car burglary has dropped is because of better anti-theft technology like LoJack and OnStar which help police track stolen vehicles. Other devices that help deter burglars include car alarms and steering-wheel disablers. Anything that makes the car look harder to steal, such as a steering-wheel lock, discourages thieves. Tinted windows and covered storage spaces further prevent tempting burglars. Drivers are also more aware and are taking the necessary precautions to protect their vehicles.

Also contributing to the decrease in car thefts is newer cars. Newer cars are harder to steal because most come with more sophisticated anti-theft security. For example, newer cars now have encrypted key codes. Before the ignition will start, it has to recognize the key’s code. This means that hot-wiring and forcing the key cylinder will be useless. The car will not start. OnStar also blocks engines from starting or can make a vehicle slow down at the request of the police.

Better law-enforcement tactics are also causing the reduction in car thefts. Police are using “bait cars” to catch regular car thieves. “Bait cars” have GPS tracking, remote engine-kill switches and video surveillance. Police are also using license-plate readers. A license-plate reader scans hundreds of plates to spot stolen cars.

Another reason less vehicles are being stolen may be because there is simply less crime. This could be due to a number of reasons including surveillance cameras, better policing, the aging population and military deployment overseas. As more thieves are jailed, fewer young people take their place.

Following is a list to illustrate just how much car theft has dropped over the year.

  • Los Angeles: Dropped from 582 per 100,000 people to 443. Los Angeles is now in 42nd place.
  • New York: Fell from 197 per 100,000 to 156. New York ranks as 223rd in the United States.
  • Las Vegas: Sank from 1,035 per 100,000 to 563. Car thefts were nearly cut in half, but Las Vegas ranks at 9th.
  • San Francisco-Oakland: Dropped from 833 per 100,000 to 611 and is in 7th place.

So what are the nation’s top ten auto theft capitals? Ranking number one is Laredo, Texas with 742 thefts per 100,000 residents. Laredo’s high ranking is due to its location. It is next to the Mexican border, and according to The Wall Street Journal, “Drug cartels are helping make the U.S.-Mexico border region a hot spot for vehicle thieves.” In 2007, Modesto, California claimed the number one ranking with 1,058 thefts per 100,000 people. Following is the nation’s top ten cities for car theft:

  1. Laredo, Texas
  2. Modesto, California
  3. Bakersfield, California
  4. Stockton, California
  5. Fresno, California
  6. Yakima, Washington
  7. San Francisco-Oakland
  8. Visalia-Porterville, California
  9. Las Vegas-Paradise, Nevada
  10. Albuquerque, New Mexico

Source:

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourCar/tough-times-for-auto-thieves.aspx

Related posts:

  1. Love Pink? Car Thieves Don’t This post is originally authored at the home security blog…

Read the original here:
Unemployment on the Horizon for Car Thieves

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Posted in Home Security Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment